Scientific American: "We Have No Reason to Believe 5G is Safe"
Even a mainstream publication like Scientific American is sounding the alarm about the coming of 5G technology. The good news is that awareness is spreading and hopefully it will ultimately reach our telecommunications policy makers. The bad news is that the health concerns from 5G technology are obviously real, and the growing outcry from scientists and the media testify to that.
Here are some highlights from the article:
- "The technology is coming, but contrary to what some people say, there could be health risks."
- "Since the FCC adopted [current] limits based largely on research from the 1980s, the preponderance of peer-reviewed research, more than 500 studies, have found harmful biologic or health effects from exposure to RFR..."
- "Since 5G is a new technology, there is no research on health effects, so we are “flying blind” to quote a U.S. senator. However, we have considerable evidence about the harmful effects of 2G and 3G."
- "We should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety."
You can read the complete article here.
Leave a comment